Justice
Matters, and Justices Matter
by V. Wayne Young, Executive Director
As I write this column, the Senate hearings on the confirmation
of John Roberts as Chief Justice of the United States have just begun.
For most ordinary citizens who are not lawyers, media-types, or political
junkies, this is just a mildly interesting news story. But school
administrators ought to have more than a passing level of interest
in the outcome.
Many of the duties and obligations (burdens?) placed
upon schools in the past four decades have come about not as a result
of legislative
action, but rather
from rulings by the U.S. Supreme Court. Free speech, special education, religious
issues, and student discipline matters have all been affected far more by judicial
decision than by legislative enactment.
The appointment of the Chief Justice (and, don’t forget, a second vacancy
on the court will be filled as well) will play a significant role in school law
decisions for the next 30 years or more. One need only look at the cases pending
before the highest court in the land for its 2005-06 term to realize just how
far-reaching some of those decisions might be.
Among the issues the court will consider in its upcoming term:
* A case defining “educational benefit” for the purposes of providing
services under IDEA;
* Sovereign immunity issues for school boards and board employees;
* The implementation of “stay put” provisions under IDEA;
* Religious discrimination by a public school district in refusing to hire
a teacher whose child
attended a private parochial school;
* Due process required in the dismissal of a superintendent;
* School-ordered removal of religious symbols from a mural painted by a student
as part of a
school beautification project;
* Denial of campus access to military recruiters;
* Overtime pay for employees of an educational institution.
Several of these cases have the potential to significantly impact
the way schools work. School leaders should have a profound interest
in both the qualifications and the judicial philosophy of those who
are appointed to the nation’s highest court.
-10/05/2005
|